In the introduction to More Women of Wonder, published in 1976, Pamela Sargent writes:
Several questions come to mind in the assembling of collections such as this one and its predecessor, Women of Wonder. The most obvious are: Why does such a collection exist at all? Should it not be evident to almost anyone that women can and have written fine science fiction?
It is clear to anyone who has read extensively in the genre. But it may be less obvious to someone who is not as familiar with sf, or to someone who may have stopped reading it years ago. If one takes the trouble to look through issues of old magazines or anthologies reprinting many of the best stories [KKR: emphasis mine], or a shelf of science fiction novels, one is struck immediately by the overwhelming preponderance of male authors. —”Introduction,” Pamela Sargent, More Women of Wonder, Vintage Books, 1976, p. xivii.
Boy, oh, boy is that frustrating to read. Because I wrote something similar in the proposal I submitted to Baen for Tough Mothers. A few things have changed in 39 years: modern magazines publish a large number of stories by women. Also, women dominate the non-literary part of the sf genre—not the part hailed by center-of-the-field critics, but the part read by readers. Yay! Women win or are nominated for a lot of the awards in the field.
But that line that I emphasized—women being underrepresented in year’s best anthologies—that still happens. In reprint collections that claim to explore the history of the field, women seem to have a lesser role, one that isn’t the same as their role in the novel field or even in the award recognition they receive.
As I mentioned in the first post I put on this site, classic award-winning stories by women are often out of print while classics by men remain in print. Dunno why.
But it sure was frustrating tonight to read an essay that, except for some explicitly 1970s language, could have been written in 2015. Sigh, sigh, sigh, sigh.